What's new

A different thought on the standard "drop box" pans

ydeardorff

New member
I know many of us, just go with the status quo' on many things.*thumbs up* Some of us dont.*thumbs up*
I have have often wondered why as kit car owners, many of us havent looked to what the big manufacturing companies have done and try to emulate them. After all they spent a fortune getting it right, why not reap the rewards of the internet, and their stupidity of posting the technical info out there for us to grab.

First of all, ALL companies mount their seats with the back or hip of the seat lower than the front. They also pay very close attention to the relationship of the seating angle, the pedal to the feet, and the steering wheel to all the other parts so a human being can climb in, and everything falls into place naturally.

Yet we, still to this day lower our pans in a square box similar to that of a bathtub bolted to the bottom of the chassis. Why?
We have a road car not a formula one car.
audi_motorsport_carbon-fibre_Monocoque-668.jpg

This seating style might seem cool looking, but might offer a very uncomfortable ride quality on bumpy city roads, and be difficult to get in and out of. But this is very similar to what we end up giving ourselves in these box drops. In this case the drivers feet are nearly as high as his heart. This would not be comfortable for very long.

We need something more realistic for our beloved bug chassis. Something that will mount the seat directly to the pan floor, but at the right angle and effective drop. Then, we need the front of the pan to drop down and away from the front of the seat in a way that would allow for modern top mounted pedals, and be in a natural position so that using those pedals flows with our natural movements.

Here are some examples of a Lamborghini Diablo chassis. Pay close attention to the floor shape.
lambo chassis1.jpg

lambo chassis2.jpg
See the two dropped areas, and the center raised area (under your knee).
lambo chassis3.jpg

lambo chassis31.jpg
The red circle is denoting where the base and front of the seat would mount, and the angle that the base of the seat would be sitting on. The flat spot to the right or rear of that would be the rear seat mounting point.

The yellow circle shows the pedal area, which as I mentioned is lowered for ergonomics so that the pedals are at a natural position and height. Mounting them from the top makes them push down and away from your foot, rather than up and away which is a less natural movement in a seated position.

So what is this long winded thread about? Rethinking the status quo. Not accepting an uncomfortable or quirky design, when it can be made a little bit better. This idea isnt rocket science, its simply rethinking this old idea. If you like things as they are, good keep your car as you see fit. But if you want things a little bit better. Perhaps this idea might be a way to start.

If you think about how you sit down in your house, whether its the couch, or a chair. Your body comfortably sits a certain way. Now sit on the floor, and lean way back with a couple pillows behind you. This is far less comfortable. In a moving vehicle where your comfort and mechanical advantage on the controls are of importance, getting the seating position right can make all the difference.

The lamborghini floor pan is the basic idea that we can run with. And in fact, having multiple angles across the base of the pan will make it even stiffer.

Anyway, take from this what you want. The automakers out there have the budgets, they do the work, if we pay attention, we can reap the rewards for all their hard work, if we pay attention.
 
Last edited:

letterman7

Honorary Admin
If memory serves, Lamborghini seats aren't adjustable, so it would make sense for an angled floorpan. In our cars, drop pans are for headroom, not comfort, until you figure out that a full length drop with an angle and/or flat area for your heels at the pedals is all you really need. The seat selection will take care of the rest in terms of angle, thigh support, etc, if you choose wisely.

For pedals, Acme has hanging pedal assemblies that bolt to the standard frame head. Really, any hanging assembly can be used as long as you have the foot room, otherwise you're cutting relief boxes in the front firewall so the pedals have enough swing travel.
 

ydeardorff

New member
Lamborghini seats as far as I know aren't adjustable, just like the stock seats from the sterling.

The rear angle is for both comfort and headroom on either the lambo or ours.

Here is an example of an ergonomic driving position

Ohara_bf4.gif


Comparatively a sterling's riding position
View attachment 7311

Though this is a poor example its the closest drawing we have to compare.
A drop of the seat and a drop at the pedals may well do some magic.
I know that I am 6'2" tall. And my legs are nearly flat on the pan floor. And when the seat is tilted back, if its too far I can run into dash board issues.
There is a lot out there we can use from the automotive industry to make our lives better.
If you want reclining seats, go for it. If your using the stock sterling/nova seats, you may have to change your plans some.
 
Last edited:

letterman7

Honorary Admin
:D You need to drop your pan more and go full length. It makes a world of difference in getting in and out. Talk with Nic.. he's your height. And I know a guy in Michigan who is that tall.. he simply made seats that, while fixed, were against the rear bulkhead. On a Bug chassis, you will never get the ergonomics of a car that was built and designed to be ergonomically "better". There simply isn't the room to do it correctly, unless you start with a tube chassis of course.
 

sector

Active member
Full length drop floor is the way to go. I've constructed my one pice floor from 2×4 tubing and 3/16 flat aluminum sheets. The total cost was $140. The seating position is significantly more comfortable than what I had with sectional fiberglass drop floors.
 

Brett Proctor

Well-known member
As the saying goes "opinions are like assholes everyone has got one"

Why can't you guys accept this for what it is. Another way to do it.

Yaughn makes the statement
This idea isnt rocket science, its simply rethinking this old idea. If you like things as they are, good keep your car as you see fit. But if you want things a little bit better. Perhaps this idea might be a way to start.
He's not telling you its better than anything else out there. And considering that no one has done it yet to a Sterling how can you shoot down the idea

If memory serves, Lamborghini seats aren't adjustable, so it would make sense for an angled floorpan.
Alot of Sterlings out there have their seats bolted down solid.

The seat selection will take care of the rest in terms of angle, thigh support, etc, if you choose wisely.
Choose from what? There isn't a seat out there except from the factory that you can bolt directly in without having to do some major mods to it to make it fit.(bending and cutting frame components, cutting the foam, reupholster) I even held on to the molds for the seat mod that I did but no one showed any interest so those are history and those seats were design from the factory with a more recline position than other seats that are being used.


Full length drop floor is the way to go.
Again how do you know if you haven't tried it.

Yaughns not telling you this is the only way to go just because Lamborghini builds it this way.

One thing that I see in the design is that you have more ground clearance going over speed bumps than you would with a full length drop.

Thats my opinion on the subject*kiss my butt*
 

sector

Active member
Am I missing something, how is that you would have more ground clearance if the lowest point is the same in all designs, partial floor pan, lower rear and front but raised middle or full length floor? Makes no sense and unnecessarily complicates design. Besides clean look, additional benefits of flat underbelly is improved aerodynamicacs.
 

letterman7

Honorary Admin
And since everyone is built differently, Brett, modifications to the floorpan and/or seats may not be necessary. Yes, everyone has opinions and I do accept what Yaughn has posted for "what it is", but those modifications, even a folded pan, take a build out of the realm of most owners hands. Many people don't have the talent (or patience) to actually make the car what they want, so they settle. You and Yaughn are the extreme exceptions. And I totally commend you guys for what you're attempting to do. On the flip side of the coin, when will they ever be on the road? I dropped the pans in my red car in a weekend. Full length, with a heel rest under the pedals. And had zero issues with speed bumps (in fact, both cars had a full length drop and never touched - one was 3" and the red car was 4").

And seats? We've had this discussion before. Triumph Spitfire was the single seat that dropped in with absolutely no modifications. But it didn't work for Roger when he got the car. Miata seats didn't work for you, but worked fine for me. There won't be a universal fit for these cars... even the fiberglass shells.

We can discuss and debate all month about integrating modern design techniques but the fact remains: modern cars are designed with those features. Trying to integrate that into a 50 year old fixed design without major modification to the key structural components is like making your desktop inkjet act like a 3D printer.
 

ydeardorff

New member
Well if that is the case, and Im speaking to .005% of this forum then I'll just use the telephone from now on.
Sorry for bugging everyone with my comments, thoughts and ideas.
Peace! *outa here*
 

letterman7

Honorary Admin
See, Yaughn, that's part of the problem. The people I butt heads with on this forum can't or won't take criticism. Yes, I know I can be an ass - I fully admit that and own it. But the fact of the matter is that you guys that delve into trying to make the car something it was never meant to be have never had a car on the road. Ever. I'm not talking bodywork and engine swaps, but serious chassis alterations (not tube chassis) that allow different seating arrangements, better ergonomics, etc.

Prove me wrong! I'd love that. Someone come forward and build a car that's ergonomically "correct" that will work for 85% of the population. Build a car that can hold it's own against a modern car - both in power, performance and comfort. If it's so easy - build it!

But first I would certainly suggest to drive a stock Sterling to see just where those improvements need to lie. Guesswork before even driving one is just that - guesswork. Islandman's (David) build with the IRS front and rear is a perfect progression of how the cars evolve without getting into unnecessary modifications. That car is well thought out and will likely outperform some of it's contemporaries in the corners and ride just as well.


I did promise to try to have a more open mind and hold my opinions back, and I failed in this thread. For that, I apologise.
 

Brett Proctor

Well-known member
Technical Forum -- a place to share ideas and troubleshoot problems.
Enjoy. :)

--W Daugherty aka farfegnubbin

It was just another option that he was throwing out there. It had just a few more bends in it than the standard option.

This post got blown way out of proportion.

If you didn't like it , fine, just let it go but others might think its worth looking into.
Yaughn was just sharing an idea

I think this is a prime example why members aren't sharing ideas like they use to.

You need to practice more on your moderator skills:D

I hope it was worth loosing a member over just to make your point. and things were just starting to pick up here
 

sector

Active member
This is a discussion forum, the whole point is to share ideas and discuss topics of interest. What is wrong about pointing out advantages and disadvantages of each approach. So if someone sais why not just use modern corvette engines like factory five kit cars are using, the other members should not point out why it may not be suitable for this kit car application? Give me a break. Rick stated his opinion on the subject and pointed out why based on his experience the other approach might be more suitable for this platform. Ask yourself a question, what will you really learn from this forum if people just post ideas and not discuss outcomes or share their experiences related to subject matter?
 
Last edited:

Peter

Active member
Much as I hate to jump in here as I have just had my wrist slapped on Euro-Nova for expressing my opinion, *kicked my butt*and it was just that. but everyone has a different way of putting things and although I have "been there and done that" over the last 50 years I am wrong, sometimes and sometimes I say something in a way that offends, (what you Peter, never! *nothing to see* Oh yeah *pbpbpbp!*) Brett and I have locked horns on a couple of occasions but he still values my opinion, I hope, I certainly appreciate his input greatly. I also have to cope with Americanisms, spellings and weird grammar as well.

Like a few others, I have a road going car, it WAS driven for 5 years and is still a sneeze away from road going with all running gear, engine, etc finished.

One of the Eagle/Nova guys is actually copying my steering as I write and a few have the same seats, Cavalier rear lights and other mods and that pleases me no end and I shall continue to have weird ideas to try and some may make it to the car. But as JFK said, " I look at things that are not and ask why not?"

I was sorry to read Rick has 'dropped off the twig' forum wise anyway, but I guess we all get to a point where we say, "what the heck, I have to move on". We all get to that point from time to time and I'm sure the 'bug' will draw him back, sooner than later, personally I will miss him and his 'unique' personality.*oh my*

In the meantime, lets just get on with the job in hand and get along as best we can and see if we can't get some more cars on the road with less of them being wrecked tying to make a silk purse from a (rather nice) sows ear (or a Farramasagini from a 1970's Nova).

I hope I haven't offend anyone's sensibilities.

At the end of the day, it's your car, your dream (nightmare) and your cash.
 
Last edited:

Brett Proctor

Well-known member
Be careful what you use for an analogy*laugh*

We can discuss and debate all month about integrating modern design techniques but the fact remains: modern cars are designed with those features. Trying to integrate that into a 50 year old fixed design without major modification to the key structural components is like making your desktop inkjet act like a 3D printer.
3ders.org - Make a DIY 3D bioprinter out of an old inkjet to print biomaterials | 3D Printer News & 3D Printing News
 

Brett Proctor

Well-known member
Am I missing something, how is that you would have more ground clearance if the lowest point is the same in all designs, partial floor pan, lower rear and front but raised middle or full length floor? Makes no sense and unnecessarily complicates design. Besides clean look, additional benefits of flat underbelly is improved aerodynamicacs.

I wasn't going to respond to this but after thinking about it for a while and the lack of posting going on*laugh* I figured I would.

If you ever seen a Lamborghini close up (we have them here so I have) you would know they can't get over a speed bump going straight at it. They need to approach it at an angle.

Now looking at the diagrams Yaughn posted the front section of the pan being higher allows the car not getting high centered when going over a speed bump at an angle hence my comment on more ground clearance, but you being an engineer would have figured that out by now. If a Lamborghini had a full length drop pan it couldn't make it over the speed bump

Ricks comment about not having ground clearance issues makes sense and for the standard build there would be no problems with having the pan lowered front to rear, but Yaughn's build is not your average build.
I get emails once in a while from him shooting ideas at me so I guess I have a better understanding of where he's going with his build. His car will be lower than most so a mod like this would help him.

I guess his mistake is that he has more enthusiasm towards his build than others and he's eager to share his ideas with others but some don't take so easy to change as others. New technology has come out since the 70's and contrary to what you may think you haven't seen it all and know it all because things are always changing and there are new things out there that haven't been tried yet.

Electric power steering still hasn't been tried yet but it should work. That wasn't here in the 70's so does that mean it wont work in the Sterling now.


Some of the posts I read I just scratch my head and wonder how many beers this person has had to come up with that idea*laugh* but I try to keep an open mind on things because I know I don't know it all. Some times it works and other times it doesn't*laugh*

We've lost two regular members now just because one had to prove the other wrong and both will be missed*whaah* Yaughn with his new school ways and Rick with his old school ways*laugh*
The only thing that came out of it is they both got pissed off and left, over what?? another way to lower the pan*sigh*
I stood up for Yaughns post because, well no one else was going to say anything and I didn't see any reason why he should be taking so much heat for just posting an idea that was already being used by a major super car builder. If you didn't think it was a good design maybe you should contact Lamborghini and talk to them about it*laugh* Again his build is not your average build so his ideas may sound a little to much for some

Maybe in time we'll get then back before this site goes into oblivion.

I have no desire to join any more forums so this is it for me

Sorry, just had to add my 2 cents in and post my thinking on the ground clearance comment
 

Peter

Active member
Hey Brett, I don't drink,
HTahwjnPNRnE0X3XkViD.gif
. Well, not since the Marco Polo in Miami on new years eve, 8 (very large) scotch and dries and one champagne on my 30th birthday, but that and the next three days is a whole (dimly remembered) story in it's own *nothing to see*.

I will continue to come up with great, stupid ideas, some even work! Law of averages, monkeys, typewriters and the works of Shakespeare come to mind.

Flat floors, no way, hate them, had a small fibre glass car with a flat floor and it hit a deep puddle at about 50 mph, did a half roll and 180 backflip combo and landed right way up 20 feet into a field facing the opposite direction *yipes* . took a tractor to get it out.

Lets keep throwing ideas into the ring and see what's what, someone might even try one, one day, and it MIGHT even work, BUT, if someone HAS gone to the bother and expense to try something, even if it didn't work, respect it.*rock on* EErm, that would be -confused* oh, bugger, just too many to count on my car :mad: . and if it does work, give praise, it means a lot, well it does to me. :eek:
 

sector

Active member
Brett,
Look closely at Lambo design, even though pans are raised, the perimiter frame remains flat which does nothing for improving ground clearance. That type of floor design is used to improve overall stiffness of the chassis and not for ground clearancing. Please do everyone a favor and research before posting useless comments.
 

sector

Active member
I did not appreciate his comments made in my references. You must respect others to be respected by others.
 
Top